Wednesday, February 1, 2012
How High
If we can agree that spirituality is intimate, and that intimacy is personal, whose to argue the means by which someone else taps into their own spiritual sense? The ad attached below illustrates this question by placing two joints in the shape of a cross and including a line that reads “does is matter how you achieve your spiritual high?” I like this ad for a couple reasons. First and foremost, it’s bold. I like that the people behind WonderCafe.ca, the website originally responsible for posting the image, weren’t afraid to ruffle a few feathers with this one, and while I don’t think the purpose of this ad was to offend anyone, I believe it effectively entices the willing viewer to further investigate their site. It does more than this though. In addition to drawing people in, this ad makes you think, it evokes emotion and provides a forum for rational debate. Sure, it’s probable that someone somewhere was offended by this and that some people may even argue it’s morally wrong to illustrate a cross of weed, but, at the end of the day, isn’t that kind of the point?
This ad challenges traditional forms of rhetoric by proposing a unique twist. Instead of jamming a one-sided message down the viewer’s throat, this particular ad places more value on the viewer’s expected response to the ad than the ad itself. All the ad does is beg a question, and because of this, it forces the viewer to get involved. It, in my opinion, successfully asks the viewer to establish an argument, a stance, a rhetorical claim if you will. And so, does it really matter how you achieve your spiritual high? It’s a loaded question and unfortunately, I think it’s a question generally answered too quickly. If you put two random people in a room, showed them this ad, and asked them to answer the question it asks, I believe they’d have their answer ready in less than a minute. What they say is irrelevant, that’s not the point I’m trying to make, instead, I’m trying to shed some light on a problem I feel too many people are effected by: blind allegiance to a stance they may not quite understand. Spirituality is complicated people! Religion is beautiful and it’s a mess and it happens all at the same time. You can’t think your way through life in terms of black and white or right and wrong, life’s just not that simple. So before you go and call this ad disrespectful or blasphemous, you might want to consider the idiocracy in sticking a label of something without taking the time to think first. If drugs are wrong and doing wrong is sinful, how do you explain the hundreds of religions who’ve incorporated cannabis into their practices? This ad makes you think, and because of that, whether you like it or hate it, it’s rhetorically successful.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree that the ad is unique and rhetorically successful. I think the visual format of the ad also helps because it has a clear focus. Like you mentioned, people are very quick to jump to conclusions or form opinions about major topics and issues which are often more complicated than what is initially perceived. Taking the time to ask yourself really thought-provoking and in-depth questions can be exhausting! Looking at the ad, its simplicity makes the question and answer seem so simple and clear, but again, its purpose shows otherwise. For people in the process of deciding on stances or adjusting opinions, I think a lot of the struggle comes from the fact that we cannot really know what information we are missing out on because we have not discovered it yet. I think that is another crucial point this ad conveys. We have to be willing to accept new information, realize that we probably will not be able to make instant conclusions, and might end up changing our minds completely in time.
ReplyDeleteI think you really posed an excellent point here. I myself was about to say, this is wrong without even really understanding the point of this ad. I think you are spot on when you say that we tend to respond to things that society has deemed socially unacceptable in a negative manner without even considering the idea that we might agree with the message that is trying to be relayed. All that being said, I like the way that the ad makes viewers think on their toes and possibly think outside the box, but I'm not really a fan of connecting drugs with a 'spiritual' feeling. All in all, if the point of the ad was to get us thinking I think it was more than effective!
ReplyDelete